![]() 04/14/2014 at 08:51 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
Stopped to get some gas on the way to work, saw these two (I believe) test mules sitting outside the McDonalds. The only badge on them that I saw was on the grill. Might I add, that a de-badged car looks like its having an identity crisis. So...anyone have any idea what the car is? 200 maybe? Regardless, they look nice.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 08:53 |
|
Thats the new Chrysler 200. Saw a truckload of them leaving Sterling Heights Assembly last week. Pretty good looking small car.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 08:55 |
|
Agree. New 200s, they don't need the camo since they've already been released.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 08:55 |
|
They look great then! Though, I think they did a poor job at covering it with their "manufacturer camo".
![]() 04/14/2014 at 08:59 |
|
It may have had a better camo job before. A lot of times engineers will rip the camo off after the car is publicly announced, so that they can have better test results while driving around. That camo/cladding weighs a bunch and if they're testing stuff like mpg, that stuff can also add drag.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:08 |
|
the back end could almost pass for an audi
or a hyundai
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:11 |
|
Chrysler prefers that you compare the 200 to an Audi.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:14 |
|
They look so incredibly bland it would be stealthier to just slap a Hyundai badge on them and go about your business witout slathering them in LOOK AT ME camo...
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:27 |
|
Chrysler:
Looks like an Audi
Built like a Hyundai!
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:28 |
|
I really like Chrysler's new styling direction
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:31 |
|
This is the first American car I've genuinely looked forward to seeing in person.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:32 |
|
Audi wants its back, Chrysler!
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:38 |
|
it looks real nice honestly. I was in a hurry, but I made sure I appreciated it's "beauty" before I left. The rear lights is what got my attention when I drove up to the pump.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:45 |
|
I don't know if it's just me, but the back of it looks like a Ghilbi.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 09:59 |
|
I'm beginning to think some manufacturers put that camo on a car to GET attention. At least that is what it seems lately.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 10:02 |
|
Dear Chrylser,
Less round. More flat, sharper edges. Taller lights. Bigger trunk. Try to hide the fact that it's just a Dart in sheeps clothes.
Sincerely,
The World.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 10:05 |
|
That could be true. But I guess, as someone else pointed out, that the drivers sometimes take the camo off of the car. The car with the camo on, didn't have a front badge, but you could still have see where the badge would of been. The other car, had a badge on the front. I think maybe the non-camo car is a newer car that they are testing.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 10:48 |
|
So, it's intelligently designed and a nice place to be?
![]() 04/14/2014 at 10:52 |
|
and in a few years time it'll start to fall apart, just like a good chrysler product should
http://jalopnik.com/the-sonatas-la…
![]() 04/14/2014 at 10:58 |
|
They appear to be going for a subtle Dodge racetrack lights corporate motif.
![]() 04/14/2014 at 11:01 |
|
What was that article supposed to prove? That people are skeptical? So what?